OET Reading Part C Patient Safety
OET Reading Part C Patient Safety
OET Reading Part C assesses your ability to understand the complex texts on healthcare topics. The questions are designed to test your skills in understanding explicit and implicit meaning.
OET Reading Part C has 6 Different Types of Questions
Views and Opinion focused questions
1. Opinion
2. Attitude
3. Impressions/Details
4. Conclusion Drawn
Lexical Question
5. Vocabulary
6. Reference
They include:
1. Gist type: Based on Topic Sentence
2. Synonym-based Questions
3. Contrast-word based Questions
4. Paraphrase-based Questions
5. Elimination based Questions
How to do Part C
Step 1: Identify the keyword (kw) of the question
Step 2: Go to the Text and locate the kw and read that sentence of the paragraph and understand it.
Step 3. Return to the Answer Choices (ac) and underline the keywords of ac in A,B,C,D.
Text C1: Patient Safety
Question 7. What point is made about the death of a female patient called Mary ?
Method of Doing:
Step 1: Identify the keyword/s (kw) of the question.
i. death of a female patient; ii. Mary
Step 2: Go to the first paragraph and locate the kws and read that sentence of the paragraph and understand it.
Text:
Paragraph 1. In a well-documented case in November 2004, a female patient called Mary was admitted to a hospital in Seattle , USA, to receive treatment for a brain aneurysm. What followed was a tragedy, made worse by the fact that it needn't have occurred at all. The patient was mistakenly injected with the antiseptic chlorhexidine. It happened, the hospital says, because of 'confusion over the three identical stainless steel bowls in the procedure room containing clear liquids - chlorhexidine, contrast dye and saline solution'. Doctors tried amputating one of Mary's legs to save her life, but the damage to her organs was too great: she died 19 days later.
Step 3. Return to the Answer Choices (ac) and underline the keywords of ac in A,B,C,D.
Question 7. What point is made about the death of a female patient called Mary ?
A. It was entirely preventable
B. Nobody was willing to accept the blame.
C. Surgeons should have tried harder to save her life.
D. It is the type of incident which is becoming increasingly common.
Step 4. Check each ac with the text:
A. It was entirely preventable:
Explanation: Text reads "... it needn't have occurred at all".
[ " needn't" = not necessarily
" have (to)" = strong obligation imposed by external factors.
At all = expressing firm opinion = entirely (Qtn)
B. Nobody was willing to accept the blame.
Explanation: Not referred to in the Text
C. Surgeons should have tried harder to save her life.
Explanation: The statement in ac is wrong because the Text says: "Doctors tried amputating one of Mary's legs to save her life, but the damage to her organs was too great ......"
D. It is the type of incident which is becoming increasingly common.
BEMAX ACADEMY
Mevram, Kollam
Helpline: 8089 0013 01
Contact person
Mr Rohit, Mob. 9496 8613 42
Academic Head
Comments
Post a Comment